The seasquirt Ciona robusta and its co-generic Ciona savignyi, are two long-divergent species, sharing the same habitat and competing for the same spaces and resources. Their very similar morphology has been responsible for the misidentification of the two organisms, and, consequently, for the underestimation of their geographic distributions and new areas of co-occurrence. In spite of the large amount of knowledge built up by developmen- tal biologists, few data are available regarding the morpho-physiology of the two sea squirts. The comparison of morphological and physiological features carried out in the present study (i.e. length-body weight correlation, tunic/organ ratio, tissue-specific retained water and metabolic rate), highlighted slight, but significant, differ- ences strongly supporting the hypothesis of different ecological strategies for the two species. More precisely, C. savignyi invests more energy in growing faster and taller, likely to improve the quality and concentration of the filtered food, and sustains a faster metabolic/growth rate. Conversely, C. robusta invests more into tunic thick- ness, reducing the risk of predation, even if this likely means a slower metabolic/growth rate. In addition it was noted that in both species, the tunic absorbs more water than the other tissues, a peculiarity that may allow them to better counteract sudden fluctuations in environmental salinity.

Comparative morpho-physiological analysis between Ciona robusta and Ciona savignyi / Tarallo, Andrea; Yagi, Mitshuaru; Oikawa, Shin; Agnisola, Claudio; D'Onofrio, Giuseppe. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-0981. - 485:(2016), pp. 83-87. [10.1016/j.jembe.2016.09.001]

Comparative morpho-physiological analysis between Ciona robusta and Ciona savignyi

AGNISOLA, CLAUDIO;
2016

Abstract

The seasquirt Ciona robusta and its co-generic Ciona savignyi, are two long-divergent species, sharing the same habitat and competing for the same spaces and resources. Their very similar morphology has been responsible for the misidentification of the two organisms, and, consequently, for the underestimation of their geographic distributions and new areas of co-occurrence. In spite of the large amount of knowledge built up by developmen- tal biologists, few data are available regarding the morpho-physiology of the two sea squirts. The comparison of morphological and physiological features carried out in the present study (i.e. length-body weight correlation, tunic/organ ratio, tissue-specific retained water and metabolic rate), highlighted slight, but significant, differ- ences strongly supporting the hypothesis of different ecological strategies for the two species. More precisely, C. savignyi invests more energy in growing faster and taller, likely to improve the quality and concentration of the filtered food, and sustains a faster metabolic/growth rate. Conversely, C. robusta invests more into tunic thick- ness, reducing the risk of predation, even if this likely means a slower metabolic/growth rate. In addition it was noted that in both species, the tunic absorbs more water than the other tissues, a peculiarity that may allow them to better counteract sudden fluctuations in environmental salinity.
2016
Comparative morpho-physiological analysis between Ciona robusta and Ciona savignyi / Tarallo, Andrea; Yagi, Mitshuaru; Oikawa, Shin; Agnisola, Claudio; D'Onofrio, Giuseppe. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-0981. - 485:(2016), pp. 83-87. [10.1016/j.jembe.2016.09.001]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.1016_j.jembe.2016.09.001.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 507.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
507.01 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/679121
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact