Building upon Carlo Tovo's claim that the recent procedural and structural reforms affecting the European Court of Justice have contributed to the constitutionalisation of that judicial body, the talk outlines the flaws of the so-called "constitutionalisation thesis" and the distinguishing features of the ECJ as a sui generis international tribunal.

Constitutionalising the Court of Justice of the EU? A reply to Carlo Tovo / Arena, Amedeo. - (2017). (Intervento presentato al convegno United in diversity: constitutional adjudication within the composite European Union tenutosi a LUISS, Viale Pola 12 nel 4/5/2017).

Constitutionalising the Court of Justice of the EU? A reply to Carlo Tovo

ARENA, AMEDEO
2017

Abstract

Building upon Carlo Tovo's claim that the recent procedural and structural reforms affecting the European Court of Justice have contributed to the constitutionalisation of that judicial body, the talk outlines the flaws of the so-called "constitutionalisation thesis" and the distinguishing features of the ECJ as a sui generis international tribunal.
2017
Constitutionalising the Court of Justice of the EU? A reply to Carlo Tovo / Arena, Amedeo. - (2017). (Intervento presentato al convegno United in diversity: constitutional adjudication within the composite European Union tenutosi a LUISS, Viale Pola 12 nel 4/5/2017).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Workshop WP.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: locandina
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.67 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/675049
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact