We compare willingness-to-pay information revealed through bids of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism with inferred valuations and real market prices. Applying nine food products, in three different experiments in which individuals express both bids and inferred valuations, the former were consistently lower than inferred valuations for others (with an average bid discount of 11.6%). We use econometric analysis to point out the importance of the limited number of auctioned products, and related information, on participants’ discount behaviour.

Do participants discount products in experimental auctions? / Vecchio, Riccardo. - In: FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE. - ISSN 0950-3293. - 55:(2017), pp. 98-101. [10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.002]

Do participants discount products in experimental auctions?

VECCHIO, RICCARDO
2017

Abstract

We compare willingness-to-pay information revealed through bids of the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) auction mechanism with inferred valuations and real market prices. Applying nine food products, in three different experiments in which individuals express both bids and inferred valuations, the former were consistently lower than inferred valuations for others (with an average bid discount of 11.6%). We use econometric analysis to point out the importance of the limited number of auctioned products, and related information, on participants’ discount behaviour.
2017
Do participants discount products in experimental auctions? / Vecchio, Riccardo. - In: FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE. - ISSN 0950-3293. - 55:(2017), pp. 98-101. [10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.002]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FQAP Discount 2017.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 249.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
249.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/669612
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact