In the field of the seismic protection of buildings, the use of steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) may be particularly appropriate for the intervention of seismic retrofitting of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings designed for gravity loads only. Some past research has shown that, when traditional full SPSWs are used as bracing devices for framed buildings, they may induce excessive design forces to the surrounding frame members. Therefore, low yield steel could be a valuable option to overcome this applicability limit. Nevertheless, the scarce availability in the market of these steels suggests the employment of aluminium alloys and perforated steel plates, which have the benefit of incurring behaviour in the plastic range for low stress levels. In this paper, in order to conduct a parametric analysis concerning the use of full and perforated SPSWs for seismic upgrading of existing RC framed structures, first some experimental tests have been numerically calibrated using the SeismoStruct software. Subsequently, the proposed finite element model has been used to design the retrofitting systems with either full or perforated SPSWs of an existing RC residential five-storey building. Finally, the differences in the use of these solutions, in terms of both structural and economic viewpoints, have been demonstrated.

Perforated Shear Panels for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings / Formisano, Antonio; Lombardi, L.. - 108:(2015), pp. 1-20. (Intervento presentato al convegno Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (CC 2015) tenutosi a Prague nel 1-4 September 2015) [10.4203/ccp.108.119].

Perforated Shear Panels for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings

FORMISANO, ANTONIO;
2015

Abstract

In the field of the seismic protection of buildings, the use of steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) may be particularly appropriate for the intervention of seismic retrofitting of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings designed for gravity loads only. Some past research has shown that, when traditional full SPSWs are used as bracing devices for framed buildings, they may induce excessive design forces to the surrounding frame members. Therefore, low yield steel could be a valuable option to overcome this applicability limit. Nevertheless, the scarce availability in the market of these steels suggests the employment of aluminium alloys and perforated steel plates, which have the benefit of incurring behaviour in the plastic range for low stress levels. In this paper, in order to conduct a parametric analysis concerning the use of full and perforated SPSWs for seismic upgrading of existing RC framed structures, first some experimental tests have been numerically calibrated using the SeismoStruct software. Subsequently, the proposed finite element model has been used to design the retrofitting systems with either full or perforated SPSWs of an existing RC residential five-storey building. Finally, the differences in the use of these solutions, in terms of both structural and economic viewpoints, have been demonstrated.
2015
978-1-905088-63-8
978-1-905088-63-8
Perforated Shear Panels for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings / Formisano, Antonio; Lombardi, L.. - 108:(2015), pp. 1-20. (Intervento presentato al convegno Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing (CC 2015) tenutosi a Prague nel 1-4 September 2015) [10.4203/ccp.108.119].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
formisano cc2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/653830
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact