This article examines the implication of the ECJ judgment of 17 July 2014, in Joined Cases C-58/13 and C-59/13 Angelo Alberto Torresi and Pierfrancesco Torresi v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Macerata, on the preliminary ruling procedure, the relationship between abuse of rights and preemption doctrine, the free movement of lawyers and the respect for national identities.
Free movement of lawyers and the Torresi judgment: a bridge too far? / Arena, Amedeo; Mastroianni, Roberto. - In: EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW. - ISSN 1574-0196. - 11:2(2015), pp. 373-388. [10.1017/S1574019615000152]
Free movement of lawyers and the Torresi judgment: a bridge too far?
ARENA, AMEDEO;MASTROIANNI, ROBERTO
2015
Abstract
This article examines the implication of the ECJ judgment of 17 July 2014, in Joined Cases C-58/13 and C-59/13 Angelo Alberto Torresi and Pierfrancesco Torresi v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati di Macerata, on the preliminary ruling procedure, the relationship between abuse of rights and preemption doctrine, the free movement of lawyers and the respect for national identities.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EuConst - Torresi.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Nota Torresi
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
641.79 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
641.79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
