Cooperative spectrum sensing techniques are mainly based on two different decision approaches, according to the role of the decision maker: i) in the Combining Decision approach, the decision maker combines the sensing information collected from its cooperators, without participating in the sensing of the monitored band; ii) in the Sensing & Combining Decision approach, the decision maker combines both the sensing information of its cooperators and its own local sensing information. The choice of the decision approach deeply affects the performance of any cooperative spectrum sensing technique. However, the key issue of choosing the decision approach that guarantees the higher detection accuracy independently of the underlying cooperative sensing architecture is still an open problem. For this, in this paper, the criteria for an effective decision-approach selection are analytically derived with the object of maximizing the detection accuracy in presence of realistic channel propagation effects. Specifically, through a theoretical analysis, it is proven that the detection accuracy exhibits a threshold behavior as a function of the adopted decision approach. Closed-form expressions of such a threshold are analytically derived and practical insights for the decision approach choice are provided. Finally, the theoretical analysis is validated through simulations.

Decision Maker Approaches for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing: Participate or Not Participate in Sensing? / Cacciapuoti, ANGELA SARA; Caleffi, Marcello; Paura, Luigi; Savoia, Roberto. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 1536-1276. - 12:5(2013), pp. 2445-2457. [10.1109/TWC.2013.031813.121112]

Decision Maker Approaches for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing: Participate or Not Participate in Sensing?

CACCIAPUOTI, ANGELA SARA;CALEFFI, MARCELLO;PAURA, LUIGI;SAVOIA, ROBERTO
2013

Abstract

Cooperative spectrum sensing techniques are mainly based on two different decision approaches, according to the role of the decision maker: i) in the Combining Decision approach, the decision maker combines the sensing information collected from its cooperators, without participating in the sensing of the monitored band; ii) in the Sensing & Combining Decision approach, the decision maker combines both the sensing information of its cooperators and its own local sensing information. The choice of the decision approach deeply affects the performance of any cooperative spectrum sensing technique. However, the key issue of choosing the decision approach that guarantees the higher detection accuracy independently of the underlying cooperative sensing architecture is still an open problem. For this, in this paper, the criteria for an effective decision-approach selection are analytically derived with the object of maximizing the detection accuracy in presence of realistic channel propagation effects. Specifically, through a theoretical analysis, it is proven that the detection accuracy exhibits a threshold behavior as a function of the adopted decision approach. Closed-form expressions of such a threshold are analytically derived and practical insights for the decision approach choice are provided. Finally, the theoretical analysis is validated through simulations.
2013
Decision Maker Approaches for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing: Participate or Not Participate in Sensing? / Cacciapuoti, ANGELA SARA; Caleffi, Marcello; Paura, Luigi; Savoia, Roberto. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 1536-1276. - 12:5(2013), pp. 2445-2457. [10.1109/TWC.2013.031813.121112]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CacCalPauSav-13.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 688.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
688.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/576350
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact