The analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine administered epidurally in dogs undergoing TPLO was compared in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Thirty client-owned dogs undergoing TPLO were assigned to one of three epidural treatments (10 dogs each): group R (1 mg kg-1 0.5% ropivacaine), group RD (1 mg kg-1 0.5% ropivacaine and 2.5 µg kg-1 0.05% dexmedetomidine) and group D (2,5 µg kg-1 0.05% dexmedetomidine). Dilution was performed with sterile 0.9% saline to maintain a total volume of 0.2 mL kg-1. Nociception was assessed intra-operatively based on changes in HR, fr and MAP. When two of these parameters increased by more than 20% from baseline values, rescue fentanyl was administered IV (3 µg kg-1). Post-operative pain was assessed using the Glasgow composite pain scale (GCPS; Holton et al. 2001) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Sedation was scored recorded using a modified Ramsey sedation scale (Ramsey et al. 1974). The medians of intra-operative physiologic parameters and post-operative pain scores were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis, followed by Bonferroni tests. No dogs in RD, 2 dogs in R and 2 dogs in D required fentanyl. Postoperative sedation scores tended to be higher (p = 0.09) in groups D and RD as compared to group R. Postoperative analgesia scores were similar in all groups (GCPS p = 0.57; VAS p = 1.00). No significant differences were observed among the remaining parameters. Epidural dexmedetomidine at the dosage of 2.5 µg kg-1, alone or in combination with ropivacaine, provided a good perioperative analgesia in dogs undergoing TPLO.
Epidural analgesia with dexmedetomidine, alone or in combination with ropivacaine, in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) / V., Rondelli; E., Zini; P., Morabito; Vesce, Giovanni; Sk, Ringer; R., Bettschart Wolfensberger. - In: VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA. - ISSN 1467-2987. - 40:5(2013), p. 559. [10.1111/vaa12053]
Epidural analgesia with dexmedetomidine, alone or in combination with ropivacaine, in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO)
VESCE, GIOVANNI;
2013
Abstract
The analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine administered epidurally in dogs undergoing TPLO was compared in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Thirty client-owned dogs undergoing TPLO were assigned to one of three epidural treatments (10 dogs each): group R (1 mg kg-1 0.5% ropivacaine), group RD (1 mg kg-1 0.5% ropivacaine and 2.5 µg kg-1 0.05% dexmedetomidine) and group D (2,5 µg kg-1 0.05% dexmedetomidine). Dilution was performed with sterile 0.9% saline to maintain a total volume of 0.2 mL kg-1. Nociception was assessed intra-operatively based on changes in HR, fr and MAP. When two of these parameters increased by more than 20% from baseline values, rescue fentanyl was administered IV (3 µg kg-1). Post-operative pain was assessed using the Glasgow composite pain scale (GCPS; Holton et al. 2001) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Sedation was scored recorded using a modified Ramsey sedation scale (Ramsey et al. 1974). The medians of intra-operative physiologic parameters and post-operative pain scores were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis, followed by Bonferroni tests. No dogs in RD, 2 dogs in R and 2 dogs in D required fentanyl. Postoperative sedation scores tended to be higher (p = 0.09) in groups D and RD as compared to group R. Postoperative analgesia scores were similar in all groups (GCPS p = 0.57; VAS p = 1.00). No significant differences were observed among the remaining parameters. Epidural dexmedetomidine at the dosage of 2.5 µg kg-1, alone or in combination with ropivacaine, provided a good perioperative analgesia in dogs undergoing TPLO.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


