We carried out a systematic review of the literature to identify the association between the use of drain and the incidence of infections and recurrences after surgery. MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ISI databases were searched up to September 2012. The two outcomes of this meta-analysis were wound infection and recurrence. Postoperative wound infection occurred in 50 of the 604 (8.28 %) patients who underwent drainage and in 68 of the 598 (11.4 %) patients who did not, with a resulting odds ratio (OR) of 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.48–1.03). Recurrence of pilonidal sinus occurred in 41 of the 604 (6.79 %) patients who underwent drainage and in 50 of the 598 (8.36 %) patients who did not, with a resulting OR of 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.52–1.23). The results suggest that, despite a trend toward a reduction in infectious complications and recurrence, drainage was not associated with a better outcome. However, because of the present literature’s limitations, further studies are needed to address this issue.

The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis / Milone, Marco; M. N. D., Di Minno; Musella, Mario; P., Maietta; P., Ambrosino; A., Pisapia; G., Salvatore; Milone, Francesco. - In: TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY. - ISSN 1123-6337. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:6(2013), pp. 625-630. [10.1007/s10151-013-1024-9]

The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis

MILONE, MARCO;MUSELLA, MARIO;MILONE, FRANCESCO
2013

Abstract

We carried out a systematic review of the literature to identify the association between the use of drain and the incidence of infections and recurrences after surgery. MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ISI databases were searched up to September 2012. The two outcomes of this meta-analysis were wound infection and recurrence. Postoperative wound infection occurred in 50 of the 604 (8.28 %) patients who underwent drainage and in 68 of the 598 (11.4 %) patients who did not, with a resulting odds ratio (OR) of 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.48–1.03). Recurrence of pilonidal sinus occurred in 41 of the 604 (6.79 %) patients who underwent drainage and in 50 of the 598 (8.36 %) patients who did not, with a resulting OR of 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.52–1.23). The results suggest that, despite a trend toward a reduction in infectious complications and recurrence, drainage was not associated with a better outcome. However, because of the present literature’s limitations, further studies are needed to address this issue.
2013
The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: a meta-analysis / Milone, Marco; M. N. D., Di Minno; Musella, Mario; P., Maietta; P., Ambrosino; A., Pisapia; G., Salvatore; Milone, Francesco. - In: TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY. - ISSN 1123-6337. - ELETTRONICO. - 17:6(2013), pp. 625-630. [10.1007/s10151-013-1024-9]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tech Coloproctol 2013.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: The role of drainage after excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus: A meta-analysis
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 347.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
347.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/562433
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact