The response of silicon–silicon–CsI(Tl) telescopes,developed within the FAZIA collaboration, to fragments produced in nuclear reactions 84Kr+120-124Sn at 35 AMeV, has been used to study ion identification methods. Two techniques are considered for thei dentification of thenuclear products in the silicon stages. The standard ΔE-E one requires signals induced in two detection layers by ions punching through the first one. Conversely, the digital Pulse Shape Analysis (PSA) allows the identification of ions stopped in the first silicon layer. The capabilities of these two identification methods have been compared for different mountings of thesilicons, i.e.rear (particles entering through the low electric field side) or front (particles entering through the high electric field side) side injection.The ΔE-E identification method gives exactly the same results in both configurations. At variance, the puls eshape discrimination is very sensitive to the detector mounting. In case of rear side injection, the identification with the‘‘energyvs.charge risetime’’ PSA method presents energy thresholds which are significantly lower than in the case of front side injection.

Comparison of charged particle identification using pulse shape discrimination and ΔE-E methods between front and rear injection in silicon detector / N., Leneindre; R., Bougault; S., Barlini; E., Bonnet; B., Borderie; G., Casini; A., Chbihi; P., Edelbruck; J. D., Frankland; D., Gruyer; E., Legouée; O., Lopez; P., Marini; M., Parlog; G., Pasquali; M., Petcu; M. F., Rivet; F., Salomon; E., Vient; R., Alba; G., Baiocco; L., Bardelli; M., Bini; R., Borcea; M., Bruno; S., Carboni; M., Cinausero; I., Cruceru; M., Degerlier; J. A., Dueñas; K., Gasior; F., Gramegna; A., Grzeszczuk; M., Kamuda; T., Kozik; V. L., Kravchuk; Lombardo, Ivano; C., Maiolino; T., Marchi; L., Morelli; F., Negoita; A., Olmi; H., Petrascu; S., Piantelli; G., Poggi; Rosato, Elio; D., Santonocito; Spadaccini, Giulio; A. A., Stefanini; T., Twarog; Vigilante, Mariano. - In: NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. - ISSN 0168-9002. - 701:(2013), pp. 145-152. [10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.005]

Comparison of charged particle identification using pulse shape discrimination and ΔE-E methods between front and rear injection in silicon detector

LOMBARDO, IVANO;ROSATO, ELIO;SPADACCINI, GIULIO;VIGILANTE, MARIANO
2013

Abstract

The response of silicon–silicon–CsI(Tl) telescopes,developed within the FAZIA collaboration, to fragments produced in nuclear reactions 84Kr+120-124Sn at 35 AMeV, has been used to study ion identification methods. Two techniques are considered for thei dentification of thenuclear products in the silicon stages. The standard ΔE-E one requires signals induced in two detection layers by ions punching through the first one. Conversely, the digital Pulse Shape Analysis (PSA) allows the identification of ions stopped in the first silicon layer. The capabilities of these two identification methods have been compared for different mountings of thesilicons, i.e.rear (particles entering through the low electric field side) or front (particles entering through the high electric field side) side injection.The ΔE-E identification method gives exactly the same results in both configurations. At variance, the puls eshape discrimination is very sensitive to the detector mounting. In case of rear side injection, the identification with the‘‘energyvs.charge risetime’’ PSA method presents energy thresholds which are significantly lower than in the case of front side injection.
2013
Comparison of charged particle identification using pulse shape discrimination and ΔE-E methods between front and rear injection in silicon detector / N., Leneindre; R., Bougault; S., Barlini; E., Bonnet; B., Borderie; G., Casini; A., Chbihi; P., Edelbruck; J. D., Frankland; D., Gruyer; E., Legouée; O., Lopez; P., Marini; M., Parlog; G., Pasquali; M., Petcu; M. F., Rivet; F., Salomon; E., Vient; R., Alba; G., Baiocco; L., Bardelli; M., Bini; R., Borcea; M., Bruno; S., Carboni; M., Cinausero; I., Cruceru; M., Degerlier; J. A., Dueñas; K., Gasior; F., Gramegna; A., Grzeszczuk; M., Kamuda; T., Kozik; V. L., Kravchuk; Lombardo, Ivano; C., Maiolino; T., Marchi; L., Morelli; F., Negoita; A., Olmi; H., Petrascu; S., Piantelli; G., Poggi; Rosato, Elio; D., Santonocito; Spadaccini, Giulio; A. A., Stefanini; T., Twarog; Vigilante, Mariano. - In: NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. - ISSN 0168-9002. - 701:(2013), pp. 145-152. [10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.005]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/522232
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact