Aquifer Pollution Vulnerability Maps were produced using four parametric methods (AVI, GOD, DRASTIC, and SINTACS) for a study area of 410 km2, an alluvial plain NE of Naples (southern Italy). The comparison between those methods shows that the AVI method, which uses only two parameters, produces vulnerability maps comparable with those obtained using more complex methods (SINTACS and DRASTIC).

Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: an example in the 'Piana Campana', southern Italy / Corniello, Alfonso; Ducci, Daniela; Napolitano, P.. - STAMPA. - 1:(1997), pp. 1721-1726. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Symposium on Engineering Geology and the Environment tenutosi a Athens, Greece nel 23-27 June, 1997).

Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: an example in the 'Piana Campana', southern Italy

CORNIELLO, ALFONSO;DUCCI, DANIELA;
1997

Abstract

Aquifer Pollution Vulnerability Maps were produced using four parametric methods (AVI, GOD, DRASTIC, and SINTACS) for a study area of 410 km2, an alluvial plain NE of Naples (southern Italy). The comparison between those methods shows that the AVI method, which uses only two parameters, produces vulnerability maps comparable with those obtained using more complex methods (SINTACS and DRASTIC).
1997
9054108770
Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using a GIS: an example in the 'Piana Campana', southern Italy / Corniello, Alfonso; Ducci, Daniela; Napolitano, P.. - STAMPA. - 1:(1997), pp. 1721-1726. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Symposium on Engineering Geology and the Environment tenutosi a Athens, Greece nel 23-27 June, 1997).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/467934
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact