A prospective multicentre survey on the treatmentof acute pancreatitis in Italy

30 citazioni su Scopus. L'articolo è il risultato di uno studio multicentrico di cui G. Benassai è un autore (membro Proinf-Aisp Study Group). RE: Missing Author Name Scopus nlinfo@elsevier.com; Dear Prof. Giacomo Benassai, Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. You have made the issue perfectly clear to me. Please be informed that I have escalated the issue to our Content Department for investigation and they will rectify the issue accordingly. As soon as I receive an answer, I am happy to contact you back. If I, or one of my colleagues, can assist you with another matter please do let us know. Kind Regards, Jeroen Hulsmann E-Helpdesk EMEA Coordinator Regional Sales Office - EMEA Elsevier B.V. [THREAD ID:1-1J7YLX6] -----Original Message----- From: gbenassa@unina.it Sent: 12/09/2012 14:52:37 To: nlinfo@elsevier.com Subject: Re: FW: Author's name correction Distinct Mr. Hulsmann Thank you for the sollicit interest about my query.This question it's very important for my career evaluation and also for the University 's department in which i belong. I have participated as a researcher in the 3 papers reported in my previous email,all of them were multicentric,so as of definition they involve diverse Institutions and Authors.In the list of Authors reported,members of the ProINF-AISP study group are citated under the voice "the members of the ProInf-AISP Study Group" who obviously do not correspond to a single unit.The single members of the citated group,amongst them the writer,are citated singularly on the last page's appendix ("G. Mosella, G. Benassai Policlinico Universitario Federico II") Napoli. The non citation of this partecipation of the Naples University Federico II comes with a problem regarding the financiation of the department,and also a discrimination on the evaluation of my personal profile as a researcher about the calculation of the citations in the H index. Furthermore in other circumstances i was citated as a participant in group studies of multicenter works,such as "Imipenem/cilastatina (1,5gr/die) versus meropenem (3,0gr/die) in pazienti con infezioni intra-addominali:risultati di uno studio clinico multicentrico,randomizzato,prospettico" publicated on Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 29:503-508,1997.I believe you have an original PDF file of this work and not a copy,therefore i result citated on scopus as a participant of the group study "Gruppo di studio Italiano" Thank you for your courtesy and interest,given the importance of the query. Trustfully yours, Prof. Giacomo Benassai Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677 (The Netherlands) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17602904 http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547668852&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=a+prospective+multicentre+survey+on+the+treatment+of+acute&sid=oNVoDQG_UHipYnJz9G131SP%3a630&sot=q&sdt=b&sl=78&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH%28a+prospective+multicentre+survey+on+the+treatment+of+acute%29&relpos=9&relpos=9&searchTerm=TITLE-ABS-KEY-AUTH(a prospective multicentre survey on the treatment of acute) BACKGROUND: The Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas released a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for acute pancreatitis in 1999. AIM: This study focused on the analysis of the therapeutic approach for the treatment of acute pancreatitis in Italy. PATIENTS: One thousand, one hundred and seventy-three patients were recruited: 1006 patients (85.8%) had mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) and 167 (14.2%) had the severe acute pancreatitis (SAP); 161 patients showed pancreatic necrosis at computed tomography; 121 patients (10.3%) had sequelae and 36 (3.1%) died. RESULTS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and tramadol were used more frequently in patients with the MAP whereas opioids and the association schedules were used more frequently in patients with the SAP (P<0.001). Gabexate mesilate was utilised in 831 out of 1173 patients (70.8%); in particular, gabexate mesilate was used in 70.6% patients with MAP and in 73.1% of those with SAP (P=0.521). The duration of the drug administration was significantly shorter in those having MAP than in those having the SAP (P<0.001). The antibiotics most frequently used for the prophylaxis against infection from pancreatic necrosis (43.1%) were carbapenems. Only a small number of patients received enteral nutrition (4.7%). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was carried out in 344 of the 1173 patients (29.3%). Surgery was performed in 48 with SAP (19 had elective biliary surgery and 29 had pancreatic surgery). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey indicate a lack of compliance with the guidelines which regard the indications mainly for interventional endoscopy and surgery.