As surgeons dedicated to the repair of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract dysfunction, the main goal of our paper was to evaluate the influence of 2 different conditions on the surgical treatment of patients suffering from achalasia, referred to our outpatient endoscopy service. Historically, both patient age and previous nonsurgical treatments were regarded in the literature as relative contraindications to surgery. Our results did not support these contentions, provided that patients fulfilled the accepted criteria for a surgical procedure. As far as cost effectiveness is concerned (Surg Endosc 2007;21:1184–1189), it seems that the comparison has been done between surgery and a single procedure (pneumatic dilation), but it is accepted that dilation often needs to be repeated 2–3 times to achieve a 90% short-term success rate, which decreases to fewer than half the patients at 5 years follow-up (Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1346). The literature suggests that these patients mandate a median of 2 (range, 1–8) sessions of endoscopic dilations (Ann Surg 2002;236:750–758), which could certainly impact the quality of life of these patients. The therapy of achalasia, whether surgical or endoscopic, should be regarded as palliative and consequently a long-term successful outcome after surgery in nearly 80% of our patients seems to be satisfying. Nevertheless, I suggest that it is best to avoid the potential to be caught in the trap of voicing the best option between the 2 very effective therapeutic options. I would like to stress that we perform surgery as well pneumatic dilation with Rigiflex balloons, but based on published literature and the analysis of our patients, I am more confident that dilation, if unsuccessful, will not alter the outcome of a subsequent myotomy.

Should Surgery Replace Pneumatic Dilation in Achalasia? Reply / Ferulano, GIUSEPPE PAOLO; Dilillo, Saverio; D'Ambra, Michele; Lionetti, Ruggero; Brunaccino, Rossella; Fico, DOMENICO IVAN; Pelaggi, Domenico. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0016-5085. - STAMPA. - 135:5(2008), pp. 1796-1796. [10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.056]

Should Surgery Replace Pneumatic Dilation in Achalasia? Reply.

FERULANO, GIUSEPPE PAOLO;DILILLO, SAVERIO;D'AMBRA, MICHELE;LIONETTI, RUGGERO;BRUNACCINO, ROSSELLA;FICO, DOMENICO IVAN;PELAGGI, DOMENICO
2008

Abstract

As surgeons dedicated to the repair of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract dysfunction, the main goal of our paper was to evaluate the influence of 2 different conditions on the surgical treatment of patients suffering from achalasia, referred to our outpatient endoscopy service. Historically, both patient age and previous nonsurgical treatments were regarded in the literature as relative contraindications to surgery. Our results did not support these contentions, provided that patients fulfilled the accepted criteria for a surgical procedure. As far as cost effectiveness is concerned (Surg Endosc 2007;21:1184–1189), it seems that the comparison has been done between surgery and a single procedure (pneumatic dilation), but it is accepted that dilation often needs to be repeated 2–3 times to achieve a 90% short-term success rate, which decreases to fewer than half the patients at 5 years follow-up (Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1346). The literature suggests that these patients mandate a median of 2 (range, 1–8) sessions of endoscopic dilations (Ann Surg 2002;236:750–758), which could certainly impact the quality of life of these patients. The therapy of achalasia, whether surgical or endoscopic, should be regarded as palliative and consequently a long-term successful outcome after surgery in nearly 80% of our patients seems to be satisfying. Nevertheless, I suggest that it is best to avoid the potential to be caught in the trap of voicing the best option between the 2 very effective therapeutic options. I would like to stress that we perform surgery as well pneumatic dilation with Rigiflex balloons, but based on published literature and the analysis of our patients, I am more confident that dilation, if unsuccessful, will not alter the outcome of a subsequent myotomy.
2008
Should Surgery Replace Pneumatic Dilation in Achalasia? Reply / Ferulano, GIUSEPPE PAOLO; Dilillo, Saverio; D'Ambra, Michele; Lionetti, Ruggero; Brunaccino, Rossella; Fico, DOMENICO IVAN; Pelaggi, Domenico. - In: GASTROENTEROLOGY. - ISSN 0016-5085. - STAMPA. - 135:5(2008), pp. 1796-1796. [10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.056]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Immagine 002.jpg

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 74.11 kB
Formato JPEG
74.11 kB JPEG   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Immagine.jpg

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 37.85 kB
Formato JPEG
37.85 kB JPEG   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/417158
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact