Abstract OBJECTIVE: To apply the updated epithelial salivary gland classification scheme to a large cohort of lacrimal gland tumors so as to provide an updated lacrimal gland tumor classification scheme. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 118 cases of epithelial neoplasia was undertaken. Main outcome measures included pathologic analysis, subtyping, and survival. RESULTS: Of 118 cases, 17 (14%) were reclassified using the proposed expanded classification scheme based on the current World Health Organization classification of salivary gland tumors. The most frequent neoplasms were pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, of which we highlight more unusual histologic features. Three tumors were found to be unclassifiable with the updated scheme, with 2 having histologically malignant features. Deficiencies and variations in pathologic assessment were noted. Variation in the histologic findings of pleomorphic adenoma and assessment of the extent of invasion of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the more histologically diverse classification of salivary gland tumors can be successfully applied to the epithelial lacrimal gland neoplasms. This expanded classification system led to reclassifying 14% of cases. Currently, there are no consistent pathologic standards for processing and evaluating these lesions.

Epithelial lacrimal gland tumors: pathologic classification and current understanding / Weis, E; Rootman, J; Joly, Tj; Berean, Kw; Al Katan, Hm; Pasternak, S; Bonavolontà, G; Strianese, Diego; Saeed, P; Feldman, Ka; Vangveeravong, S; Lapointe, Js; White, V. A.. - In: ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 0003-9950. - STAMPA. - 127:8(2009), pp. 1016-1028.

Epithelial lacrimal gland tumors: pathologic classification and current understanding

STRIANESE, DIEGO;
2009

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To apply the updated epithelial salivary gland classification scheme to a large cohort of lacrimal gland tumors so as to provide an updated lacrimal gland tumor classification scheme. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 118 cases of epithelial neoplasia was undertaken. Main outcome measures included pathologic analysis, subtyping, and survival. RESULTS: Of 118 cases, 17 (14%) were reclassified using the proposed expanded classification scheme based on the current World Health Organization classification of salivary gland tumors. The most frequent neoplasms were pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, of which we highlight more unusual histologic features. Three tumors were found to be unclassifiable with the updated scheme, with 2 having histologically malignant features. Deficiencies and variations in pathologic assessment were noted. Variation in the histologic findings of pleomorphic adenoma and assessment of the extent of invasion of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the more histologically diverse classification of salivary gland tumors can be successfully applied to the epithelial lacrimal gland neoplasms. This expanded classification system led to reclassifying 14% of cases. Currently, there are no consistent pathologic standards for processing and evaluating these lesions.
2009
Epithelial lacrimal gland tumors: pathologic classification and current understanding / Weis, E; Rootman, J; Joly, Tj; Berean, Kw; Al Katan, Hm; Pasternak, S; Bonavolontà, G; Strianese, Diego; Saeed, P; Feldman, Ka; Vangveeravong, S; Lapointe, Js; White, V. A.. - In: ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 0003-9950. - STAMPA. - 127:8(2009), pp. 1016-1028.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Epithelial lacrimal gland tumors.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 7.61 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.61 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/416860
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 32
  • Scopus 103
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 96
social impact