François de La Mothe Le Vayer, Montaigne's heir and a representative of a certain freethinking 17th century, was strongly criticised by Port-Royal, particularly by Arnauld. The latter understood the risks that were being spread by the exploitation of the Cartesian method applied to history. Indeed, the approach of Le Vayer led to the questioning of history as a science, thus endangering the teaching of sacred history.

La question historiographique entre cartésianisme, anti-cartésianisme et pyrronisme / Amodio, Paolo. - In: CHRONIQUES DE PORT-ROYAL. - ISSN 0529-4975. - 61:(2011), pp. 95-113.

La question historiographique entre cartésianisme, anti-cartésianisme et pyrronisme

AMODIO, PAOLO
2011

Abstract

François de La Mothe Le Vayer, Montaigne's heir and a representative of a certain freethinking 17th century, was strongly criticised by Port-Royal, particularly by Arnauld. The latter understood the risks that were being spread by the exploitation of the Cartesian method applied to history. Indeed, the approach of Le Vayer led to the questioning of history as a science, thus endangering the teaching of sacred history.
2011
La question historiographique entre cartésianisme, anti-cartésianisme et pyrronisme / Amodio, Paolo. - In: CHRONIQUES DE PORT-ROYAL. - ISSN 0529-4975. - 61:(2011), pp. 95-113.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
port-royal paolo amodio.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 200.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
200.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/398979
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact