A reliable assessment of the thermal environment should take into account the whole of the six parameters affecting the thermal sensation (air temperature, air velocity, humidity, mean radiant temperature, metabolic rate and thermo-physical properties of clothing). Anyway, the need of a quick evaluation based on few measurements and calculations has leaded to like best temperature-humidity indices instead of rational methods based on the heat balance on the human body. Among these, Canadian Hu-midex, preliminarily used only for weather forecasts, is becoming more and more wide-spread for a generalized assessment of both outdoor and indoor thermal environments. This custom arouses great controversies since using an index validated in outdoor con-ditions does not assure its indoor reliability. Moreover is it really possible to carry out the thermal environment assessment ignoring some of variables involved in the physio-logical response of the human body? Aiming to give a clear answer to these questions, this paper deals with a comparison between the assessment carried out according to the rational methods suggested by International Standards in force and the Humidex index. This combined analysis under hot stress situations (indoor and outdoor) has been pre-liminarily carried out; in a second phase the study deals with the indoor comfort predic-tion. Obtained results show that Humidex index very often leads to the underestimation of the workplace dangerousness and a poor reliability of comfort prediction when it is used in indoor situations.

THERMAL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT RELIABILITY USING TEMPERATURE – HUMIDITY INDICES / F. R., d'Ambrosio Alfano; Palella, BORIS IGOR; Riccio, Giuseppe. - In: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0019-8366. - 49:1(2011), pp. 95-106. [10.2486/indhealth.MS1097]

THERMAL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT RELIABILITY USING TEMPERATURE – HUMIDITY INDICES

PALELLA, BORIS IGOR;RICCIO, GIUSEPPE
2011

Abstract

A reliable assessment of the thermal environment should take into account the whole of the six parameters affecting the thermal sensation (air temperature, air velocity, humidity, mean radiant temperature, metabolic rate and thermo-physical properties of clothing). Anyway, the need of a quick evaluation based on few measurements and calculations has leaded to like best temperature-humidity indices instead of rational methods based on the heat balance on the human body. Among these, Canadian Hu-midex, preliminarily used only for weather forecasts, is becoming more and more wide-spread for a generalized assessment of both outdoor and indoor thermal environments. This custom arouses great controversies since using an index validated in outdoor con-ditions does not assure its indoor reliability. Moreover is it really possible to carry out the thermal environment assessment ignoring some of variables involved in the physio-logical response of the human body? Aiming to give a clear answer to these questions, this paper deals with a comparison between the assessment carried out according to the rational methods suggested by International Standards in force and the Humidex index. This combined analysis under hot stress situations (indoor and outdoor) has been pre-liminarily carried out; in a second phase the study deals with the indoor comfort predic-tion. Obtained results show that Humidex index very often leads to the underestimation of the workplace dangerousness and a poor reliability of comfort prediction when it is used in indoor situations.
2011
THERMAL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT RELIABILITY USING TEMPERATURE – HUMIDITY INDICES / F. R., d'Ambrosio Alfano; Palella, BORIS IGOR; Riccio, Giuseppe. - In: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0019-8366. - 49:1(2011), pp. 95-106. [10.2486/indhealth.MS1097]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/371484
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 102
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 89
social impact