This study evaluated, in vitro, the effects of different instrumentations used in the treatment of peri-implantitis on implant surfaces coated with hydroxyapatite or titanium plasma spray (TPS). Materials and Methods: There were 14 cylindrical rough implants used, including 7 hydroxyapatite and 7 TPS coated. Split in 2 parts for a total of 24 experimental surfaces, implants were treated with a stainless-steel curette, plastic curette, ultrasonic scaler tip, and air-powder-water spray. There was 1 hydroxyapatite and 1 TPS implant used as controls. Profilometry and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine instrumented surfaces for variations in surface topography. Results: All experimental procedures determined changes on tested rough implant surfaces. Such alterations were related to the implant coating material, and the procedure consisting in coating removal and/or leveling of surface roughness. Conclusion: Although a plastic curette and air-powder-water spray induced less implant surface alterations, these instrumentations left deposits on the surface that may affect, in vivo, the tissue healing process.

Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations / Ramaglia, Luca; DI LAURO, ALESSANDRO ESPEDITO; F., Morgese; Squillace, Antonino. - In: IMPLANT DENTISTRY. - ISSN 1056-6163. - STAMPA. - 15:1(2006), pp. 77-82. [10.1097/01.id.0000202425.35072.4e]

Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations

RAMAGLIA, LUCA;DI LAURO, ALESSANDRO ESPEDITO;SQUILLACE, ANTONINO
2006

Abstract

This study evaluated, in vitro, the effects of different instrumentations used in the treatment of peri-implantitis on implant surfaces coated with hydroxyapatite or titanium plasma spray (TPS). Materials and Methods: There were 14 cylindrical rough implants used, including 7 hydroxyapatite and 7 TPS coated. Split in 2 parts for a total of 24 experimental surfaces, implants were treated with a stainless-steel curette, plastic curette, ultrasonic scaler tip, and air-powder-water spray. There was 1 hydroxyapatite and 1 TPS implant used as controls. Profilometry and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine instrumented surfaces for variations in surface topography. Results: All experimental procedures determined changes on tested rough implant surfaces. Such alterations were related to the implant coating material, and the procedure consisting in coating removal and/or leveling of surface roughness. Conclusion: Although a plastic curette and air-powder-water spray induced less implant surface alterations, these instrumentations left deposits on the surface that may affect, in vivo, the tissue healing process.
2006
Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations / Ramaglia, Luca; DI LAURO, ALESSANDRO ESPEDITO; F., Morgese; Squillace, Antonino. - In: IMPLANT DENTISTRY. - ISSN 1056-6163. - STAMPA. - 15:1(2006), pp. 77-82. [10.1097/01.id.0000202425.35072.4e]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/160244
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact