Background: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is increasingly used for medical education and healthcare counseling. Objective: To evaluate the reliability, quality, usefulness, and readability of ChatGPT-4o responses to professional medical quizzes and patient frequently asked questions (FAQs) about Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Twenty-two quizzes were put into ChatGPT-4o and also given to two neurologists. ChatGPT answers to 20 FAQs were analyzed by three neurologists using the modified Discern score, the Global Quality score, and the Usefulness score. Text readability was assessed using the Flesch–Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Results: The agreement between the neurologists and ChatGPT was fair. The answers to the FAQs were of good quality, but unreliable and difficult to read. Conclusions: ChatGPT may be an additional valid tool for professional medical education. The quality of the answers to the FAQs is good, but the text is aimed primarily at highly educated individuals. The readability and reliability of the output would likely improve by providing the chatbot with specific prompts.

Quality and Readability of ChatGPT Performance on Parkinson's Disease / Riccio, G., Coppola, R., Chiariello, M.R., Giglio, A., De Rosa, A.. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 2330-1619. - (2026). [10.1002/mdc3.70700]

Quality and Readability of ChatGPT Performance on Parkinson's Disease

Riccio G.;Coppola R.;Chiariello M. R.;Giglio A.;De Rosa A.
2026

Abstract

Background: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is increasingly used for medical education and healthcare counseling. Objective: To evaluate the reliability, quality, usefulness, and readability of ChatGPT-4o responses to professional medical quizzes and patient frequently asked questions (FAQs) about Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Twenty-two quizzes were put into ChatGPT-4o and also given to two neurologists. ChatGPT answers to 20 FAQs were analyzed by three neurologists using the modified Discern score, the Global Quality score, and the Usefulness score. Text readability was assessed using the Flesch–Kincaid Reading Grade Level, the Flesch Reading Ease Score, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook. Results: The agreement between the neurologists and ChatGPT was fair. The answers to the FAQs were of good quality, but unreliable and difficult to read. Conclusions: ChatGPT may be an additional valid tool for professional medical education. The quality of the answers to the FAQs is good, but the text is aimed primarily at highly educated individuals. The readability and reliability of the output would likely improve by providing the chatbot with specific prompts.
2026
Quality and Readability of ChatGPT Performance on Parkinson's Disease / Riccio, G., Coppola, R., Chiariello, M.R., Giglio, A., De Rosa, A.. - In: MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE. - ISSN 2330-1619. - (2026). [10.1002/mdc3.70700]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Quality and Readability of ChatGPT Performance on Parkinson_s Disease.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 212.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
212.95 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1068822
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact