Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) assumes a time-invariant Poisson process on mainshocks, not accounting for aftershocks. The removal of these events is subjective, as it depends on the chosen declustering procedure. Moreover, declustering may also result in a significant underestimation of the seismic hazard because aftershocks can significantly contribute to ground shaking, as shown by recent earthquake sequences. The present study investigates the reliability and technical feasibility of a methodology based on epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) synthetic catalogs to include earthquake sequences in PSHA. Specifically, we apply the SimplETAS algorithm to create a large number of realistic synthetic catalogs, each spanning 50 yr. We assign a plausible seismogenic structure in the epicentral area to each earthquake in the synthetic catalog, enabling numerical hazard-curve generation without assuming a Poisson distribution. This methodology has been applied to four Italian cities: L’Aquila, Reggio Calabria, Firenze, and Milano. We compare our hazard curves with the ones from the National Seismic Hazard Model for Italy (MPS19), as well as with its sequence-corrected version, which accounts for earthquake sequences through a numerical adjustment of the Poisson earthquake rate (MPS19_cluster). The results indicate that: (1) explicitly modeling earthquake sequences substantially increases seismic hazard at all sites; (2) SimplETAS-based and MPS19_cluster hazard curves generally agree well, including at short-return periods where the numerical correction used in MPS19_cluster can be mathematically questionable; (3) in Milano—where seismic hazard is the lowest—the two curves diverge, underscoring the impact of the different spatial variability of the magnitude distribution in the SimplETAS and MPS19 models; and (4) notably, the ETAS-based approach permits flexible choice of any forecasting time window relevant to the risk analysis and naturally captures spatial correlation of risk.
Including Earthquake Sequences on National Seismic Hazard Models Through ETAS-Based Synthetic Catalogs: The Case of Italy / Pane, A., Visini, F., Mancini, S., Marzocchi, W.. - In: BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. - ISSN 0037-1106. - 116:4(2026), pp. 1752-1761. [10.1785/0120260024]
Including Earthquake Sequences on National Seismic Hazard Models Through ETAS-Based Synthetic Catalogs: The Case of Italy
Marzocchi W.
2026
Abstract
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) assumes a time-invariant Poisson process on mainshocks, not accounting for aftershocks. The removal of these events is subjective, as it depends on the chosen declustering procedure. Moreover, declustering may also result in a significant underestimation of the seismic hazard because aftershocks can significantly contribute to ground shaking, as shown by recent earthquake sequences. The present study investigates the reliability and technical feasibility of a methodology based on epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) synthetic catalogs to include earthquake sequences in PSHA. Specifically, we apply the SimplETAS algorithm to create a large number of realistic synthetic catalogs, each spanning 50 yr. We assign a plausible seismogenic structure in the epicentral area to each earthquake in the synthetic catalog, enabling numerical hazard-curve generation without assuming a Poisson distribution. This methodology has been applied to four Italian cities: L’Aquila, Reggio Calabria, Firenze, and Milano. We compare our hazard curves with the ones from the National Seismic Hazard Model for Italy (MPS19), as well as with its sequence-corrected version, which accounts for earthquake sequences through a numerical adjustment of the Poisson earthquake rate (MPS19_cluster). The results indicate that: (1) explicitly modeling earthquake sequences substantially increases seismic hazard at all sites; (2) SimplETAS-based and MPS19_cluster hazard curves generally agree well, including at short-return periods where the numerical correction used in MPS19_cluster can be mathematically questionable; (3) in Milano—where seismic hazard is the lowest—the two curves diverge, underscoring the impact of the different spatial variability of the magnitude distribution in the SimplETAS and MPS19 models; and (4) notably, the ETAS-based approach permits flexible choice of any forecasting time window relevant to the risk analysis and naturally captures spatial correlation of risk.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BSSA_Pane_etal_2026.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.86 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


