The measurement of small bowel length (SBL) is crucial in clinical contexts such as surgical planning, assessment of nutritional absorption and management of conditions like short bowel syndrome (SBS) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, the literature reports substantial variations in measurements of average SBL, influenced by a multitude of methodological and patient-specific factors. The present review provides a comprehensive analysis of existing methodologies for SBL measurement, including intraoperative and radiologic approaches, detailing their strengths, limitations, and sources of error. The key factors influencing measurement variability are discussed, including methodological differences related to the measurement tool (e.g. intraoperative vs. imaging-based), bowel preparation process (e.g. stretching of the bowel), starting reference points. Additionally, inter-individual characteristics (e.g. height, BMI, sex) and population-specific factors (e.g. patients with SBS or CD) are assessed for their contribution to SBL variability. The aim pertains to informing clinical practice by providing a critical evaluation of measurement techniques and variability factors that impair standardized measurements of SBL to support research for clinical practice.

A comprehensive review of small bowel length measurement: methodological challenges and variability factors / Mascolini, M.V., Bonaldi, L., Toniolo, I., Berardo, A., Foletto, M., Zerunian, M., Caruso, D., Silecchia, G., Musella, M., Petrucciani, N., Fontanella, C.G.. - In: PROGRESS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2516-1091. - 7:3(2025), p. 032008. [10.1088/2516-1091/ade8c1]

A comprehensive review of small bowel length measurement: methodological challenges and variability factors

Musella, Mario
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2025

Abstract

The measurement of small bowel length (SBL) is crucial in clinical contexts such as surgical planning, assessment of nutritional absorption and management of conditions like short bowel syndrome (SBS) and Crohn’s disease (CD). However, the literature reports substantial variations in measurements of average SBL, influenced by a multitude of methodological and patient-specific factors. The present review provides a comprehensive analysis of existing methodologies for SBL measurement, including intraoperative and radiologic approaches, detailing their strengths, limitations, and sources of error. The key factors influencing measurement variability are discussed, including methodological differences related to the measurement tool (e.g. intraoperative vs. imaging-based), bowel preparation process (e.g. stretching of the bowel), starting reference points. Additionally, inter-individual characteristics (e.g. height, BMI, sex) and population-specific factors (e.g. patients with SBS or CD) are assessed for their contribution to SBL variability. The aim pertains to informing clinical practice by providing a critical evaluation of measurement techniques and variability factors that impair standardized measurements of SBL to support research for clinical practice.
2025
A comprehensive review of small bowel length measurement: methodological challenges and variability factors / Mascolini, M.V., Bonaldi, L., Toniolo, I., Berardo, A., Foletto, M., Zerunian, M., Caruso, D., Silecchia, G., Musella, M., Petrucciani, N., Fontanella, C.G.. - In: PROGRESS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 2516-1091. - 7:3(2025), p. 032008. [10.1088/2516-1091/ade8c1]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Small Bowel Measurement 2025.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.86 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1060414
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact