Background: The role of beta-blockers in the management of uncomplicated arterial hypertension remains a subject of clinical debate. While beta-blockers are established cornerstones for heart failure and post-myocardial infarction care, their independent efficacy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients without these compelling indications is less clear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between beta-blocker use and MACE in a real-world hypertensive population without prevalent cardiovascular diseases. Methods: We analyzed 6,702 hypertensive patients from the Campania Salute Network (CSN) registry without prevalent coronary or cerebrovascular disease, valvular heart disease, or heart failure. The association between beta-blocker use and MACE was assessed using three statistical approaches: multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and overlap weighting (OW). An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed based on baseline prescription, and an exploratory per-protocol (PP) sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of sustained treatment adherence. Results: At baseline, 18.1% (n=1,247) of patients were receiving a beta-blocker. Over a median follow-up of 52 months, 308 MACE (4.5%) occurred. After multivariable adjustment and weighting, beta-blocker use was not associated with a lower risk of MACE in the ITT population (Adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.52; PSM HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82-1.70; OW HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82-1.46). In the exploratory PP sensitivity analysis, even among adherent patients, beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a lower risk of MACE. Conversely, adherence to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and statins was associated with a lower risk of MACE. Beta-blocker users also exhibited a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors, including elevated triglycerides, glycemia, and uric acid levels. Conclusions: In patients with uncomplicated hypertension, beta-blocker use was not associated with a lower risk of MACE, regardless of treatment adherence. These findings are consistent with clinical guidelines that prioritize non-beta-blocker regimens and recommend using beta-blockers in the presence of compelling indications.

Beta-blockers in patients with uncomplicated arterial hypertension: data from the Campania Salute Network Registry / Basile, Christian; Mancusi, Costantino; Fucile, Ilaria; Trimarco, Valentina; Bossone, Eduardo; Lembo, Maria; Canciello, Grazia; Pacella, Daniela; Giugliano, Giuseppe; Losi, Maria Angela; Piccolo, Raffaele; Izzo, Raffaele; Morisco, Carmine; Esposito, Giovanni. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES. - ISSN 2058-5225. - (2026). [10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag089]

Beta-blockers in patients with uncomplicated arterial hypertension: data from the Campania Salute Network Registry

Basile, Christian;Mancusi, Costantino;Fucile, Ilaria;Trimarco, Valentina;Bossone, Eduardo;Lembo, Maria;Canciello, Grazia;Pacella, Daniela;Giugliano, Giuseppe;Losi, Maria Angela;Piccolo, Raffaele;Izzo, Raffaele;Morisco, Carmine;Esposito, Giovanni
2026

Abstract

Background: The role of beta-blockers in the management of uncomplicated arterial hypertension remains a subject of clinical debate. While beta-blockers are established cornerstones for heart failure and post-myocardial infarction care, their independent efficacy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients without these compelling indications is less clear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between beta-blocker use and MACE in a real-world hypertensive population without prevalent cardiovascular diseases. Methods: We analyzed 6,702 hypertensive patients from the Campania Salute Network (CSN) registry without prevalent coronary or cerebrovascular disease, valvular heart disease, or heart failure. The association between beta-blocker use and MACE was assessed using three statistical approaches: multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and overlap weighting (OW). An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed based on baseline prescription, and an exploratory per-protocol (PP) sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of sustained treatment adherence. Results: At baseline, 18.1% (n=1,247) of patients were receiving a beta-blocker. Over a median follow-up of 52 months, 308 MACE (4.5%) occurred. After multivariable adjustment and weighting, beta-blocker use was not associated with a lower risk of MACE in the ITT population (Adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.52; PSM HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82-1.70; OW HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82-1.46). In the exploratory PP sensitivity analysis, even among adherent patients, beta-blocker therapy was not associated with a lower risk of MACE. Conversely, adherence to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and statins was associated with a lower risk of MACE. Beta-blocker users also exhibited a higher prevalence of metabolic risk factors, including elevated triglycerides, glycemia, and uric acid levels. Conclusions: In patients with uncomplicated hypertension, beta-blocker use was not associated with a lower risk of MACE, regardless of treatment adherence. These findings are consistent with clinical guidelines that prioritize non-beta-blocker regimens and recommend using beta-blockers in the presence of compelling indications.
2026
Beta-blockers in patients with uncomplicated arterial hypertension: data from the Campania Salute Network Registry / Basile, Christian; Mancusi, Costantino; Fucile, Ilaria; Trimarco, Valentina; Bossone, Eduardo; Lembo, Maria; Canciello, Grazia; Pacella, Daniela; Giugliano, Giuseppe; Losi, Maria Angela; Piccolo, Raffaele; Izzo, Raffaele; Morisco, Carmine; Esposito, Giovanni. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES. - ISSN 2058-5225. - (2026). [10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag089]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1049154
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact