BACKGROUND: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed among patients undergoing myocardial revascularisation. AIMS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between complex PCI and the risk of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes. METHODS: Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework. The primary analysis was restricted to studies providing adjusted risk estimates, whereas the secondary analysis included unadjusted risk estimates. The primary outcomes were myocardial infarction and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, target lesion or vessel revascularisation, and stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for prognostic studies was used to determine the level of certainty in the association between complex PCI and the risk of events. RESULTS: We included 290,039 patients, of whom 94,633 (33%) underwent complex PCI. Compared with non-complex PCI, patients undergoing complex PCI had a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.71, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.49-1.96), major bleeding (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CrI: 1.14-1.35), all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.12-1.32), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.29, 95% CrI: 1.15-1.46), stent thrombosis (adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CrI: 1.49-2.14), target lesion or vessel revascularisation (adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CrI: 1.58-2.50), and stroke (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.03-1.42). The posterior probability of a higher risk associated with complex versus non-complex PCI was >99% for all study outcomes. Except for stroke (which was low certainty), the certainty of evidence was moderate to high for all other outcomes. Secondary analysis, including unadjusted risk estimates, provided consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing complex PCI have an increased risk of both ischaemic and bleeding events compared with patients undergoing non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD420250656254).

Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Piccolo, Raffaele; Pio Vitale, Antonio; Laino, Angelo; Franzone, Anna; Cirillo, Plinio; Di Serafino, Luigi; Bardi, Luca; Spaccarotella, Carmen Anna Maria; Esposito, Giovanni. - In: EUROINTERVENTION. - ISSN 1969-6213. - 22:7(2026), pp. 402-414. [10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01204]

Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Piccolo, Raffaele;Pio Vitale, Antonio;Laino, Angelo;Franzone, Anna;Cirillo, Plinio;Di Serafino, Luigi;Bardi, Luca;Spaccarotella, Carmen Anna Maria;Esposito, Giovanni
2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly performed among patients undergoing myocardial revascularisation. AIMS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between complex PCI and the risk of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes. METHODS: Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework. The primary analysis was restricted to studies providing adjusted risk estimates, whereas the secondary analysis included unadjusted risk estimates. The primary outcomes were myocardial infarction and major bleeding. The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, target lesion or vessel revascularisation, and stroke. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for prognostic studies was used to determine the level of certainty in the association between complex PCI and the risk of events. RESULTS: We included 290,039 patients, of whom 94,633 (33%) underwent complex PCI. Compared with non-complex PCI, patients undergoing complex PCI had a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 1.71, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 1.49-1.96), major bleeding (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CrI: 1.14-1.35), all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.12-1.32), cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.29, 95% CrI: 1.15-1.46), stent thrombosis (adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CrI: 1.49-2.14), target lesion or vessel revascularisation (adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CrI: 1.58-2.50), and stroke (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CrI: 1.03-1.42). The posterior probability of a higher risk associated with complex versus non-complex PCI was >99% for all study outcomes. Except for stroke (which was low certainty), the certainty of evidence was moderate to high for all other outcomes. Secondary analysis, including unadjusted risk estimates, provided consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing complex PCI have an increased risk of both ischaemic and bleeding events compared with patients undergoing non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD420250656254).
2026
Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Piccolo, Raffaele; Pio Vitale, Antonio; Laino, Angelo; Franzone, Anna; Cirillo, Plinio; Di Serafino, Luigi; Bardi, Luca; Spaccarotella, Carmen Anna Maria; Esposito, Giovanni. - In: EUROINTERVENTION. - ISSN 1969-6213. - 22:7(2026), pp. 402-414. [10.4244/EIJ-D-25-01204]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026_EuroIntv_Piccolo_Ischaemic and bleeding events after complex versus non-complex PCI_a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 5.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.42 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/1046094
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact