In the post-digital condition, where the digital is no longer a separate domain but the pervasive environment of social life, this article addresses the methodological and epistemological challenges of studying human-algorithmplatform interactions. Digital platforms are understood as socio-technical systems that mediate user behavior through opaque algorithmic mechanisms, producing data as co-constructed artifacts rather than neutral traces. The paper proposes an adaptive epistemological framework that responds to digital data’s hybrid and processual nature, emphasizing the need for flexible, plural, and reflexive research designs. The work conceptualizes data hybridization as a methodological paradigm capable of capturing active engagement and passive traces through a comparative analysis of digital and computational ethnography, web scraping, APIs, and data donation. The discussion culminates in a typological framework that systematizes data-gathering techniques according to user awareness and researcher intervention, offering practical and theoretical guidance for navigating an increasingly algorithmic and datafied research landscape.
Post-Digital Data-Gathering and the Adaptive Epistemological Framework: Navigating the Human-Algorithm-Platform Nexus / Acampa, Suania; Padricelli, Giuseppe Michele; Punziano, Gabriella. - In: ITALIAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW. - ISSN 2239-8589. - 16:16(s)(2026), pp. 413-438. [10.13136/isr.v16i16S.973]
Post-Digital Data-Gathering and the Adaptive Epistemological Framework: Navigating the Human-Algorithm-Platform Nexus
suania acampa;giuseppe michele padricelli;gabriella punziano
2026
Abstract
In the post-digital condition, where the digital is no longer a separate domain but the pervasive environment of social life, this article addresses the methodological and epistemological challenges of studying human-algorithmplatform interactions. Digital platforms are understood as socio-technical systems that mediate user behavior through opaque algorithmic mechanisms, producing data as co-constructed artifacts rather than neutral traces. The paper proposes an adaptive epistemological framework that responds to digital data’s hybrid and processual nature, emphasizing the need for flexible, plural, and reflexive research designs. The work conceptualizes data hybridization as a methodological paradigm capable of capturing active engagement and passive traces through a comparative analysis of digital and computational ethnography, web scraping, APIs, and data donation. The discussion culminates in a typological framework that systematizes data-gathering techniques according to user awareness and researcher intervention, offering practical and theoretical guidance for navigating an increasingly algorithmic and datafied research landscape.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2_Padricelli+et+al_16S+(5).pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
390.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
390.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


