Background: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) values ≥0.90 are associated with a low incidence of adverse events. Objectives: The AQVA (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR) trial aims to test whether a QFR-based virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to a conventional angiography-based PCI at obtaining optimal post-PCI QFR results. Methods: The AQVA trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 300 patients (356 study vessels) undergoing PCI were randomized 1:1 to receive either QFR-based virtual PCI or angiography-based PCI (standard of care). The primary outcome was the rate of study vessels with a suboptimal post-PCI QFR value, which was defined as <0.90. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, stent length/lesion, and stent number/patient. Results: Overall, 38 (10.7%) study vessels missed the prespecified optimal post-PCI QFR target. The primary outcome occurred significantly more frequently in the angiography-based group (n = 26, 15.1%) compared with the QFR-based virtual PCI group (n = 12 [6.6%]; absolute difference = 8.5%; relative difference = 57%; P = 0.009). The main cause of a suboptimal result in the angiography-based group is the underestimation of a diseased segment outside the stented one. There were no significant differences among secondary endpoints, although stent length/lesion and stent number/patient were numerically lower in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06 and P = 0.08, respectively), whereas procedure length was higher in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06). Conclusions: The AQVA trial demonstrated the superiority of QFR-based virtual PCI over angiography-based PCI with regard to post-PCI optimal physiological results. Future larger randomized clinical trials that demonstrate the superiority of this approach in terms of clinical outcomes are warranted. (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR [AQVA]; NCT04664140).
QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial / Biscaglia, Simone; Verardi, Filippo Maria; Tebaldi, Matteo; Guiducci, Vincenzo; Caglioni, Serena; Campana, Roberta; Scala, Antonella; Marrone, Andrea; Pompei, Graziella; Marchini, Federico; Scancarello, Davide; Pignatelli, Gianluca; D'Amore, Sergio Musto; Colaiori, Iginio; Demola, Pierluigi; Di Serafino, Luigi; Tumscitz, Carlo; Penzo, Carlo; Erriquez, Andrea; Manfrini, Marco; Campo, Gianluca. - In: JACC. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1876-7605. - 16:7(2023). [10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.054]
QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial
Di Serafino, Luigi;
2023
Abstract
Background: Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) quantitative flow ratio (QFR) values ≥0.90 are associated with a low incidence of adverse events. Objectives: The AQVA (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR) trial aims to test whether a QFR-based virtual percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to a conventional angiography-based PCI at obtaining optimal post-PCI QFR results. Methods: The AQVA trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 300 patients (356 study vessels) undergoing PCI were randomized 1:1 to receive either QFR-based virtual PCI or angiography-based PCI (standard of care). The primary outcome was the rate of study vessels with a suboptimal post-PCI QFR value, which was defined as <0.90. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration, stent length/lesion, and stent number/patient. Results: Overall, 38 (10.7%) study vessels missed the prespecified optimal post-PCI QFR target. The primary outcome occurred significantly more frequently in the angiography-based group (n = 26, 15.1%) compared with the QFR-based virtual PCI group (n = 12 [6.6%]; absolute difference = 8.5%; relative difference = 57%; P = 0.009). The main cause of a suboptimal result in the angiography-based group is the underestimation of a diseased segment outside the stented one. There were no significant differences among secondary endpoints, although stent length/lesion and stent number/patient were numerically lower in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06 and P = 0.08, respectively), whereas procedure length was higher in the virtual PCI group (P = 0.06). Conclusions: The AQVA trial demonstrated the superiority of QFR-based virtual PCI over angiography-based PCI with regard to post-PCI optimal physiological results. Future larger randomized clinical trials that demonstrate the superiority of this approach in terms of clinical outcomes are warranted. (Angio-based Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual PCI Versus Conventional Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI QFR [AQVA]; NCT04664140).| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AQUA Trial_2023.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
AQUA Trial_2023.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
AQUA Trial_2023.pdf
non disponibili
Dimensione
1.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


