The evolution of reproductive isolation is of central interest in evolutionary biology. In plants, this is typically achieved by a combination of pre- and postpollination mechanisms that prevent, or limit, the amount of interspecific gene flow. Here, we investigated and compared two ecologically defined groups of Mediterranean orchids that differ in pollination biology and pollinator specificity: sexually deceptive orchids versus food-deceptive orchids.We used experimental crosses to assess the strength of postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic reproductive isolation, and a phylogenetic framework to determine their relative rates of evolution.We found quantitative and qualitative differences between the two groups. Food-deceptive orchids have weak premating isolation but strong postmating isolation, whereas the converse situation characterizes sexually deceptive orchids. Only postzygotic reproductive isolation among food-deceptive orchids was found to evolve in a clock-like manner. Comparison of evolutionary rates, within a common interval of genetic distance, showed that the contribution of postmating barriers was more relevant in the food-deceptive species than in the sexually deceptive species. Asymmetry in prezygotic isolation was found among food-deceptive species. Our results indicate that postmating barriers are most important for reproductive isolation in food-deceptive orchids, whereas premating barriers are most important in sexually deceptive orchids. The different rate of evolution of reproductive isolation and the relative strength of pre- and postmating barriers may have implication for speciation processes in the two orchid groups.

Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids / Scopece, Giovanni; Musacchio, A; Widmer, A; Cozzolino, Salvatore. - In: EVOLUTION. - ISSN 0014-3820. - STAMPA. - 61:(2007), pp. 2623-2642. [10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00231.x]

Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids

SCOPECE, GIOVANNI;COZZOLINO, SALVATORE
2007

Abstract

The evolution of reproductive isolation is of central interest in evolutionary biology. In plants, this is typically achieved by a combination of pre- and postpollination mechanisms that prevent, or limit, the amount of interspecific gene flow. Here, we investigated and compared two ecologically defined groups of Mediterranean orchids that differ in pollination biology and pollinator specificity: sexually deceptive orchids versus food-deceptive orchids.We used experimental crosses to assess the strength of postmating prezygotic, and postzygotic reproductive isolation, and a phylogenetic framework to determine their relative rates of evolution.We found quantitative and qualitative differences between the two groups. Food-deceptive orchids have weak premating isolation but strong postmating isolation, whereas the converse situation characterizes sexually deceptive orchids. Only postzygotic reproductive isolation among food-deceptive orchids was found to evolve in a clock-like manner. Comparison of evolutionary rates, within a common interval of genetic distance, showed that the contribution of postmating barriers was more relevant in the food-deceptive species than in the sexually deceptive species. Asymmetry in prezygotic isolation was found among food-deceptive species. Our results indicate that postmating barriers are most important for reproductive isolation in food-deceptive orchids, whereas premating barriers are most important in sexually deceptive orchids. The different rate of evolution of reproductive isolation and the relative strength of pre- and postmating barriers may have implication for speciation processes in the two orchid groups.
2007
Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids / Scopece, Giovanni; Musacchio, A; Widmer, A; Cozzolino, Salvatore. - In: EVOLUTION. - ISSN 0014-3820. - STAMPA. - 61:(2007), pp. 2623-2642. [10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00231.x]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Scopece et al.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 857.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
857.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
abstract.doc

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 21 kB
Formato Microsoft Word
21 kB Microsoft Word   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/102481
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 179
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 176
social impact