Urinary Diversion Versus Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy

Objective: This study aimed to compare adverse in-hospital outcomes in ileal conduit versus neobladder urinary diversion type after radical cystectomy (RC) in contemporary versus historical patients. Methods: Patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS 2000–2019). Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:2 ratio) and multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were used. Results: Of 10,533 contemporary (2011–2019) patients, 943 (9.0%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion, while 9590 (91.0%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. Furthermore, of 9742 historical (2010–2019) patients, 932 (9.6%) underwent neobladder urinary diversion and 8810 (90.4%) underwent ileal conduit urinary diversion. After 1:2 PSM, within the contemporary cohort, 943/943 (100%) neobladder versus 1886/9590 (19.6%) ileal conduit patients were included. Similarly, within the historical cohort, 932/932 (100%) neobladder versus 1864/8810 (21.1%) ileal conduit patients were included after PSM. In multivariable LRMs, relative to contemporary neobladder patients, contemporary ileal conduit patients exhibited higher rates of overall postoperative (49.0 vs. 43.6%; multivariable odds ratio [MOR] 1.2), wound (4.2 vs. 2.7%; MOR 1.6), and genitourinary (13.1% vs. 10.0%; MOR 1.3) complications as well as blood transfusions (19.0 vs. 15.6%; MOR 1.3). Conversely, in multivariable LRMs within the historical cohort, no differences were recorded between ileal conduit and neobladder patients. Conclusions: Unlike historical comparisons between ileal conduit and neobladder patients, where no differences in adverse in-hospital outcomes were recorded, analyses relying on a contemporary patient cohort subject to PSM and multivariable adjustment revealed higher rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes in 4/13 examined categories. This observation should be considered at informed consent.