The results of a shake table test program on two Steel Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF) structures alternatively equipped with and without nonstructural elements are presented in this article. The nonstructural elements included ceilings and ductile infill drywalls. The design criteria, the geometrical features of the structural and nonstructural components, the adopted scaling procedure, the experimental setup, and the testing procedure are explained. The global and local responses of the two mockups are compared. The results show that the nonstructural elements had a minor impact on the global structural responses (e.g., structural period, maximum and residual inter-story drifts, and floor accelerations) except at very high intensities (PGA>1.0 g). Similar considerations are valid for beam-to-column joints, which exhibited similar hysteretic behavior and types of damage. The ceiling remained nearly undamaged despite experiencing peak horizontal and vertical accelerations of 3.6 and 20 times greater than those of the corresponding floors. The infill walls experienced peak accelerations that were 4.4 and 3.5 times higher than the average of the corresponding floors in both in-plane and out-of-plane directions, respectively. These walls also exhibited surface panel board buckling due to their interaction with the columns.
Shake table test on a steel moment resisting frame with nonstructural elements / Landolfo, R.; D'Aniello, M.; Safaei, S.; Fiorino, L.; Di Sarno, L.; Le Maoult, A.; Rastiello, G.. - In: ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. - ISSN 1873-7323. - 333:(2025). [10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120191]
Shake table test on a steel moment resisting frame with nonstructural elements
Landolfo R.
Primo
;D'Aniello M.;Safaei S.;Fiorino L.;Di Sarno L.Co-ultimo
;
2025
Abstract
The results of a shake table test program on two Steel Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF) structures alternatively equipped with and without nonstructural elements are presented in this article. The nonstructural elements included ceilings and ductile infill drywalls. The design criteria, the geometrical features of the structural and nonstructural components, the adopted scaling procedure, the experimental setup, and the testing procedure are explained. The global and local responses of the two mockups are compared. The results show that the nonstructural elements had a minor impact on the global structural responses (e.g., structural period, maximum and residual inter-story drifts, and floor accelerations) except at very high intensities (PGA>1.0 g). Similar considerations are valid for beam-to-column joints, which exhibited similar hysteretic behavior and types of damage. The ceiling remained nearly undamaged despite experiencing peak horizontal and vertical accelerations of 3.6 and 20 times greater than those of the corresponding floors. The infill walls experienced peak accelerations that were 4.4 and 3.5 times higher than the average of the corresponding floors in both in-plane and out-of-plane directions, respectively. These walls also exhibited surface panel board buckling due to their interaction with the columns.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Engineering Structures 2025.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
20.25 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
20.25 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


