industrial applications. Directed evolution, which mimics natural evo-
lution, has proved to be a strategy suitable for improving or altering
enzyme properties such as speci
fi
cities, activity, stability and solubility
by methods of genetic diversity integration [
worthy that this approach, of a time-consuming and cost-intensive
nature, is based on procedures that use model substrates to detect target
activities in order to provide more detailed qualitative data on enzyme
properties. So far, the analysis of FAE activity has not been straight-
forward, mainly due to a lack of suitable compounds for practical high-
throughput assays [
In a previous study, it was reported that the fungus
Fusarium oxy-
sporum
showed multiple FAE enzymes enabling its ability to grow on
varied materials such as wheat straw and corn cobs [
cular, heterologous recombinant expression of type C FAE, belonging to
the SF2 subfamily, was carried out in
Pichia pastoris
and the re-
combinant enzyme was puri
fi
ed and characterized using di
ff
erent
substrates including methyl esters of hydroxycinnamates [
This study was aimed at developing evolved variants of FoFaeC with
higher activity than the wild type enzyme and improved resistance to
temperature and solvent exposure. The objectives were therefore to
generate a library of mutants by error-prone polymerase chain reaction
(ep-PCR) in
Yarrowia lipolytica
and apply this platform in conjunction
with a high-throughput method to select the best variants. In addition,
docking studies were employed to examine the a
ffi
nity of the di
ff
erent
substrates with the wild type and the selected evolved variants of
FoFaeC.
Materials and methods
Chemicals
Yeast extract, bacto tryptone, bacto peptone and yeast nitrogen base
(without amino acids and without ammonium sulphate) were pur-
chased from Difco (Difco, Paris, France). QIAprep kit from Qiagen
(Hilden, Germany) was used for plasmid extraction and PCR fragment
puri
fi
cations. Enzymes were purchased from Promega, Wisconsin, USA
and methyl cinnamate substrates were provided by Apin Chemicals ltd,
Oxford, UK. 5-Bromo-4-chloroindol-3-yl ferulate (X-Fe) was provided
by LISBP (Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRA, INSA, Toulouse,
France). 4-nitrophenyl ferulate (
p
NP-Fe) and 4-nitrocatechol-1-yl fer-
ulate (4NTC-Fe) [
7] were provided by Taros Chemicals (Dortmund, Germany). Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma
–
Aldrich (Sig-
ma
–
Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).
Vectors, strains and culture media
The
Escherichia coli
strain Top 10 was used for transformations and
manipulations of recombinant plasmids and its growth was performed
at 37 °C in Luria
–
Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L bacto tryptone, 10 g/L
NaCl, and 5 g/L yeast extract) supplemented with 100
μ
g/ mL of am-
picillin or 40
μ
g/mL of kanamycin to select transformed clones.
The JMP62-TEF-ppLIP2-LIP2 expression vector [
12] was used for
the cloning of the
faeC
cDNA from
F. oxysporum
and its mutants in
Y.
lipolytica
strain JMP1212. The Ura3 transformants obtained by yeast
transformation,
were selected on YNBG medium (1.7 g/L yeast nitrogen
base, sterilized by
fi
ltration; 10 g/L glucose; 5 g/L NH
4
Cl; 50 mM
phosphates bu
ff
er pH 6.8 phosphates bu
ff
er Na/K (10%, v/v); 2 g/L
casamino acids, sterilized by
fi
ltration) and grown in rich medium YPD
(10 g/L bactopeptone; 10 g/L yeast extract; 10 g/L glucose) and
YT2DH5 (10 g/L yeast extract; 20 g/L tryptone; 50 mM phosphates
bu
ff
er pH 6.8 Na/K (20%, v/v) supplemented with 50 g/L glucose). For
solid media, 20 g/L agar was added.
Recombinant vectors construction
Two types of cloning were performed using the cDNA sequence of
fofaec
cDNA, synthesized and optimized following
Y. lipolytica
codon
usage (NZYTech, Lisbon, Portugal), in which three di
ff
erent restriction
sites, BamHI, BsrGI and AvrII, were inserted. The cDNA was cloned
either with its own optimized native signal sequence (indicated as
FoFaeC + SP) or by fusing the sequence of the mature protein with
preproLIP2 (indicated as FoFaeC
–
SP), a pro-peptide that has been
shown in some cases to increase the level of extracellular recombinant
protein [
The plasmid JMP62-TEF-ppLIP2-LIP2 and
fofaec
cDNA were di-
gested by restriction enzymes BamHI/AvrII and BsrgI/AvrII (Promega,
Wisconsin, USA). In order to prevent circularization and re-ligation of
linearized DNA, dephosphorylation of the linearized vector ends was
performed using Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP) (Promega,
Wisconsin, USA).
The ligation of DNA fragments with cohesive ends was carried out
overnight at 4 °C in presence of T4 DNA ligase (Promega, Wisconsin,
USA) and, after plasmid ampli
fi
cation in
E. coli
, linearization by NotI
(Promega, Wisconsin, USA) was performed according to manufacturer
’
s
instruction.
Error-prone PCR strategy
The expression cassette dedicated to the library construction of
mutants was obtained by overlapping PCR ampli
fi
cation as described
by Bordes et al. [
14]. PCR reactions were carried out in order to amplify DNA sequence of interest using MyCyclerTIM thermal cycler (Bio-Rad,
North America). Primers used in PCR reactions are listed in
Table 1
.
Y. lipolytica preparation and transformation
Competent cells preparation and transformation of
Y. lipolytica
wild
type was performed as previously described in [
Wild type FoFaeC puri
fi
cation
The crude cell-free extract was concentrated by ultra
fi
ltration
(Amicon chamber 8200, cut o
ff
10 kDa membrane Millipore, Billerica,
MA) and puri
fi
ed by immobilized metal ion a
ffi
nity chromatography
(IMAC). The concentrated sample was loaded onto a HisTrap 1 mL
column (GE Healthcare). The column was
fi
rst washed with 20 mM
sodium phosphate bu
ff
er (pH 7) containing 100 mM sodium chloride,
10 mM imidazole and then a linear salt gradient was applied, at a
fl
ow
rate of 1 mL/min, from 0 to 100% of elution bu
ff
er (20 mM sodium
phosphate bu
ff
er pH 7 containing 100 mM NaCl and 500 mM
Table 1
Primers used into the PCR strategy.
Primer name
PCR reaction
Sequence
PCR1_d
upstream region/faithfull
GATCCCCACCGGAATTGC
PCR1_RT
GCACCTGGGGAATGAAGCCGAGCACGAGCACG
PCR2_d
cDNA of interest + downstream Zeta/epPCR
CGTGCTCGTGCTCGGCTTCATTCCCCAGGTGC
PCR2_RT
GGAGTTCTTCGCCACCCC
PCR3_d
Fusion of PCR fragments PCR 1and 2
CCGCCTGTCGGGAACCGCGTTCAGGTGGAACAGGACCACC
PCR3_RT
CCGCACTGAAGGGCTTTGTGAGAGAGGTAACGCCG
G. Cerullo et al.
New BIOTECHNOLOGY 51 (2019) 14–20
15