This paper argues that the process of deriving legitimacy criteria for political institutions ought to be sensitive to features of the political context in which that process is to occur. The paper builds on Allen Buchanan's 'Metacoordination View' of legitimacy, which we explicate in the first section. While sympathetic to Buchanan's practical approach, we believe the idea of a metacoordination process to be underspecified across two dimensions, which we explain in the second section: (i) constituency and (ii) normativity. Both dimensions admit of differing specifications. In the third section, we suggest that how best to fill in these dimensions in any one instance depends upon the political context in which the metacoordination process is to occur. We highlight three relevant elements of a political decision context - criticality, institutional time point, and motivational landscape - and illustrate their significance by way of reference, respectively, to the World Health Organization, the European Economic and Monetary Union, and the Bank of International Settlements. The 'context-dependence' of the metacoordination process, and therefore of legitimacy, entails the possibility that institutions that are similar, even identical, in terms of their nature and function may nevertheless be held to differing legitimacy criteria in differing political contexts.

Legitimacy, metacoordination and context-dependence / Maffettone, P; Ulas, L. - In: INTERNATIONAL THEORY. - ISSN 1752-9719. - 11:1(2019), pp. 81-109. [10.1017/S1752971918000258]

Legitimacy, metacoordination and context-dependence

maffettone, p
Primo
;
2019

Abstract

This paper argues that the process of deriving legitimacy criteria for political institutions ought to be sensitive to features of the political context in which that process is to occur. The paper builds on Allen Buchanan's 'Metacoordination View' of legitimacy, which we explicate in the first section. While sympathetic to Buchanan's practical approach, we believe the idea of a metacoordination process to be underspecified across two dimensions, which we explain in the second section: (i) constituency and (ii) normativity. Both dimensions admit of differing specifications. In the third section, we suggest that how best to fill in these dimensions in any one instance depends upon the political context in which the metacoordination process is to occur. We highlight three relevant elements of a political decision context - criticality, institutional time point, and motivational landscape - and illustrate their significance by way of reference, respectively, to the World Health Organization, the European Economic and Monetary Union, and the Bank of International Settlements. The 'context-dependence' of the metacoordination process, and therefore of legitimacy, entails the possibility that institutions that are similar, even identical, in terms of their nature and function may nevertheless be held to differing legitimacy criteria in differing political contexts.
2019
Legitimacy, metacoordination and context-dependence / Maffettone, P; Ulas, L. - In: INTERNATIONAL THEORY. - ISSN 1752-9719. - 11:1(2019), pp. 81-109. [10.1017/S1752971918000258]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
maffettone- ulas - 2019.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: ARTICOLO COMPLETO
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 383 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/744296
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact