We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease not treated according to guidelines, recommending combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From 2002 to 2010, we assessed death up to 5 years in 650 patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and at least one coronary lesion (>50 %): 23 % were treated conservatively (MT), 17 % with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 11 % with AVR, and 49 % with combined CABG and AVR. At a median follow-up of 58 months, overall death decreased over the groups (MT, 68 % vs. PCI, 44 % vs. AVR, 34 % vs. CABG and AVR, 23 %, p < 0.01). Compared to the MT group, Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders showed significantly reduced mortality in the PCI, AVR, and CABG and AVR groups. When combined CABG and AVR is not feasible, PCI or AVR alone still improves significantly long-term survival as compared with MT alone.

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations / Di Gioia, Giuseppe; Pellicano, Mariano; Toth, Gabor G; Casselman, Filip; Adjedj, Julien; Van Praet, Frank; Stockman, Bernard; Degrieck, Ivan; Trimarco, Bruno; Wijns, William; De Bruyne, Bernard; Barbato, Emanuele. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1937-5395. - 9:2(2016), pp. 145-152. [10.1007/s12265-016-9680-6]

Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations

TRIMARCO, BRUNO;BARBATO, EMANUELE
2016

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease not treated according to guidelines, recommending combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From 2002 to 2010, we assessed death up to 5 years in 650 patients with moderate/severe aortic stenosis and at least one coronary lesion (>50 %): 23 % were treated conservatively (MT), 17 % with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 11 % with AVR, and 49 % with combined CABG and AVR. At a median follow-up of 58 months, overall death decreased over the groups (MT, 68 % vs. PCI, 44 % vs. AVR, 34 % vs. CABG and AVR, 23 %, p < 0.01). Compared to the MT group, Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders showed significantly reduced mortality in the PCI, AVR, and CABG and AVR groups. When combined CABG and AVR is not feasible, PCI or AVR alone still improves significantly long-term survival as compared with MT alone.
2016
Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Not Treated According to Current Recommendations / Di Gioia, Giuseppe; Pellicano, Mariano; Toth, Gabor G; Casselman, Filip; Adjedj, Julien; Van Praet, Frank; Stockman, Bernard; Degrieck, Ivan; Trimarco, Bruno; Wijns, William; De Bruyne, Bernard; Barbato, Emanuele. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1937-5395. - 9:2(2016), pp. 145-152. [10.1007/s12265-016-9680-6]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/635604
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact