Incremental forming process, in all its variants, results to be ideal when flexibility is required, especially for small-batch and customized production. Two point incremental forming with partial die (TPIF) presents notable advantages compared to single point incremental forming (SPIF) for obtaining components that present both concave and convex zones; on the other hand, these advantages are not so evident in the case of simple geometries. The following study compares the two techniques by geometrical considerations, FEM analyses and experimental evaluations. Cone frusta are obtained starting from aluminum alloy sheets and features like geometric accuracy, forming and setup times, forming forces and deformative states are investigated, in order to highlight differences and similarities between the two techniques. In particular, TPIF allows to obtain geometries very similar to the designed ones, but requires higher setup and forming times.

Some remarks about single and two point incremental forming / Formisano, Antonio; Boccarusso, Luca; MEMOLA CAPECE MINUTOLO, Fabrizio; Carrino, Luigi; Durante, Massimo; Langella, Antonio. - (2015). (Intervento presentato al convegno XII Convegno dell'Associazione Italiana di Tecnologia Meccanica tenutosi a Palermo nel 7-9 Settembre 2015).

Some remarks about single and two point incremental forming

FORMISANO, ANTONIO;BOCCARUSSO, LUCA;MEMOLA CAPECE MINUTOLO, FABRIZIO;CARRINO, LUIGI;DURANTE, MASSIMO;LANGELLA, ANTONIO
2015

Abstract

Incremental forming process, in all its variants, results to be ideal when flexibility is required, especially for small-batch and customized production. Two point incremental forming with partial die (TPIF) presents notable advantages compared to single point incremental forming (SPIF) for obtaining components that present both concave and convex zones; on the other hand, these advantages are not so evident in the case of simple geometries. The following study compares the two techniques by geometrical considerations, FEM analyses and experimental evaluations. Cone frusta are obtained starting from aluminum alloy sheets and features like geometric accuracy, forming and setup times, forming forces and deformative states are investigated, in order to highlight differences and similarities between the two techniques. In particular, TPIF allows to obtain geometries very similar to the designed ones, but requires higher setup and forming times.
2015
9788890606120
Some remarks about single and two point incremental forming / Formisano, Antonio; Boccarusso, Luca; MEMOLA CAPECE MINUTOLO, Fabrizio; Carrino, Luigi; Durante, Massimo; Langella, Antonio. - (2015). (Intervento presentato al convegno XII Convegno dell'Associazione Italiana di Tecnologia Meccanica tenutosi a Palermo nel 7-9 Settembre 2015).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/612913
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact