Alternative Gaseous Fuels are not new, but the fuel metering systems have become very sophisticated in order to control the flow of several products, such as Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), Hydrogen, Methanol and others. Alternative fuels and vehicles are now quite widespread, since they reduce emissions and dependence on foreign oil/energy supplies. In particular, CNG is currently being measured by means of a volumetric method when natural gas is supplied to a petrol pump, while is measured by a mass method when the gas is loaded into the vehicles. These different metering approaches can cause misalignments between the two metering systems, thereby causing arguments and disputes. In this paper, a metrological comparison between the two alternative CNG measurement approaches (volumetric vs. mass flow metering) is carried out. In order to show and to stress the inconsistencies connected to these different measuring methods, the main results of a case study are presented and illustrated.

Measurement of the compressed natural gas in automative application: a comparitive analysis between mass versus volumetric metering methods / Cascetta, F.; Musto, Marilena; Rotondo, G.. - In: FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION. - ISSN 0955-5986. - 19:6(2008), pp. 338-341. [10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2008.05.003]

Measurement of the compressed natural gas in automative application: a comparitive analysis between mass versus volumetric metering methods

MUSTO, MARILENA;
2008

Abstract

Alternative Gaseous Fuels are not new, but the fuel metering systems have become very sophisticated in order to control the flow of several products, such as Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), Hydrogen, Methanol and others. Alternative fuels and vehicles are now quite widespread, since they reduce emissions and dependence on foreign oil/energy supplies. In particular, CNG is currently being measured by means of a volumetric method when natural gas is supplied to a petrol pump, while is measured by a mass method when the gas is loaded into the vehicles. These different metering approaches can cause misalignments between the two metering systems, thereby causing arguments and disputes. In this paper, a metrological comparison between the two alternative CNG measurement approaches (volumetric vs. mass flow metering) is carried out. In order to show and to stress the inconsistencies connected to these different measuring methods, the main results of a case study are presented and illustrated.
2008
Measurement of the compressed natural gas in automative application: a comparitive analysis between mass versus volumetric metering methods / Cascetta, F.; Musto, Marilena; Rotondo, G.. - In: FLOW MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION. - ISSN 0955-5986. - 19:6(2008), pp. 338-341. [10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2008.05.003]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
11000315123601990[1]Flow meas 2008.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 752.6 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
752.6 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/302968
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact