In the framework of the SPEAR (Seismic PErformance Assessment and Rehabilitation) research Project, an under-designed three storey RC frame structure, designed to sustain only gravity loads, was subjected, in three different configurations "as-built", Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) retrofitted and rehabilitated by reinforced concrete (RC) jacketing, to a series of bi-directional pseudodynamic (PsD) tests under different values of peak ground acceleration (PGA) (from a minimum of 0.20g to a maximum of 0.30g). The seismic deficiencies exhibited by the "as-built" structure after the test at PGA level of 0.20g were confirmed by a post - test assessment of the structural seismic capacity performed by a nonlinear static pushover analysis implemented on the structure lumped plasticity model. To improve the seismic performance of the "as-built" structure, two rehabilitation interventions by using either FRP laminates or RC jacketing were designed. Assumptions for the analytical modeling, design criteria and calculation procedures along with local and global intervention measures and their installation details are herein presented and discussed. Nonlinear static pushover analyses for the assessment of the theoretical seismic capacity of the structure in each retrofitted configuration were performed and compared with the experimental outcomes.

Comparative Assessment of Seismic Rehabilitation Techniques on a Full-Scale 3-Story RC Moment Frame Structure / DI LUDOVICO, Marco; Balsamo, Alberto; Prota, Andrea; Manfredi, Gaetano. - In: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS. - ISSN 1225-4568. - STAMPA. - 28:6(2008), pp. 727-747.

Comparative Assessment of Seismic Rehabilitation Techniques on a Full-Scale 3-Story RC Moment Frame Structure

DI LUDOVICO, MARCO
;
BALSAMO, ALBERTO;PROTA, ANDREA;MANFREDI, GAETANO
2008

Abstract

In the framework of the SPEAR (Seismic PErformance Assessment and Rehabilitation) research Project, an under-designed three storey RC frame structure, designed to sustain only gravity loads, was subjected, in three different configurations "as-built", Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) retrofitted and rehabilitated by reinforced concrete (RC) jacketing, to a series of bi-directional pseudodynamic (PsD) tests under different values of peak ground acceleration (PGA) (from a minimum of 0.20g to a maximum of 0.30g). The seismic deficiencies exhibited by the "as-built" structure after the test at PGA level of 0.20g were confirmed by a post - test assessment of the structural seismic capacity performed by a nonlinear static pushover analysis implemented on the structure lumped plasticity model. To improve the seismic performance of the "as-built" structure, two rehabilitation interventions by using either FRP laminates or RC jacketing were designed. Assumptions for the analytical modeling, design criteria and calculation procedures along with local and global intervention measures and their installation details are herein presented and discussed. Nonlinear static pushover analyses for the assessment of the theoretical seismic capacity of the structure in each retrofitted configuration were performed and compared with the experimental outcomes.
2008
Comparative Assessment of Seismic Rehabilitation Techniques on a Full-Scale 3-Story RC Moment Frame Structure / DI LUDOVICO, Marco; Balsamo, Alberto; Prota, Andrea; Manfredi, Gaetano. - In: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS. - ISSN 1225-4568. - STAMPA. - 28:6(2008), pp. 727-747.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Balsamo - Comparative Assessment of Seismic Rehabilitation Techniques on a Full-Scale 3-Story RC Moment Frame Structure.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11588/204649
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact